Teams that adapt will grow with intention, hire better people, and waste less time. Nearly two-thirds of U.S. hiring decision-makers plan to increase headcount in early 2026, the strongest outlook since 2020. Intent to hire is high. Execution is the challenge.
Below are the trends that reflect what TA teams are navigating right now and how they need to respond.
Strong TA teams are using AI to surface patterns faster, prioritize outreach, improve matching, and remove manual work. AI should support evaluation, not replace it. Gartner, a leading research and advisory firm, predicts that by 2027, 75% of hiring processes will include some form of skills or certification assessment, reinforcing this shift toward AI as a support to judgment.
AI can accelerate clarity, but it can’t compensate for unclear roles, weak outreach, or misaligned teams. Used well, it strengthens decision-making. Used poorly, it creates speed without direction. When used effectively, AI helps recruiters gain clearer insight into skills, certifications, and the day-to-day demands of a role.
Focus Here: Use AI to accelerate clear processes. Don’t use it to compensate for unclear roles or misalignment.
Job titles vary, and strong candidates don’t always look perfect on paper. It takes skills-first hiring to shift the focus from where someone worked to what they can actually do. LinkedIn research shows that skills-based approaches can expand available talent pools by up to ten times. Employer data supports this shift. Half of hiring decision-makers cite lack of relevant experience as their top barrier, while pay and benefits concerns have declined. The issue is clearly alignment.
Resumes are subjective and rarely reflect a person’s true skills, abilities, or job fit. If teams were hiring paper, that process would work. But they’re hiring people.
Focus Here: Redefine roles around skills and outcomes, not titles or familiar credentials, so you don’t narrow your talent pool.
The U.S. quits rate hovered around 2.0% in late 2025, signaling fewer people willing to change jobs during uncertainty. The result is friction.
Roles stay open longer, and teams that rely heavily on inbound applicants feel the slowdown first. Passive engagement, speed, and clarity matter more when fewer candidates are raising their hands.
Focus Here: Invest in proactive outreach and tighten follow-through when fewer candidates are actively looking.
The result is more activity, slower decisions, and missed opportunities, especially in high-interest roles where volume overwhelms the process. As AI tools help candidates tailor resumes, teams often spend more time screening strong paper profiles that don’t align with the person behind them.
Focus Here: Strengthen screening and prioritization so increased volume does not slow hiring or dilute decision-making.
Candidates are rejecting the friction caused by a slow process, unclear communication, and unnecessary hurdles. Teams that are silent or delaying the process, are quietly pushing strong candidates out of the funnel. The biggest drop-off happens after the application is submitted and before a candidate speaks to a real person.
Candidates don’t require perfection. They require clarity, consistency, and follow-through.
Focus Here: Remove friction by prioritizing clear communication and timely next steps.
Diversification means combining postings with proactive outreach, referrals, targeted sourcing, and direct engagement. It means meeting talent where they are instead of waiting for them to apply.
Focus Here: Diversify beyond job postings with outreach and engagement to maintain momentum when alignment is harder to find.
RCI helps organizations align talent, process, and follow-through so recruiting strategies can keep pace with what is next.